|
|
after his arrest, the kunming intermediate people's court sentenced to death on pengmou his appeal to the high court. the victim's father is a village cadre, he was asked to maintain the death penalty the judge to consider both sides were farmers, poor economic conditions do victims his father's work, that is because the pengmou families have never come forward daosheng apologize, they are 60000, to come to court to give the victims father. pengmou sister door to give the old father knelt down and cried and said: me to do for her daughter, to spare his life! subsequently, the judge bought gifts, sat over 7 hours the car came to the the luquan mountain victims at home,louboutin, the girl go in helping the cooking, like their own home. old man moved, and then wrote a a kill some reason, not to have to the point where capital punishment. kill two is necessary generational feud, keep to the family he could come atonement. , > wcc: li changkui case, the course of justice can not withstand the twists and turns
to kill? or not to kill?
beijing news: the reprieve judgments why caused the public to question
hear which side the voice on the backward which side. first, the case the.
villagers raped and killed young girls and killed the boy turned himself in penitence received reprieve
2007, the state of the provinces, the death penalty approved by the rights reverted to the supreme court. this year's overhaul of the criminal law has abolished the 13 kinds of death penalty.
judge: to kill his two generations feud, keep him also to the family of atonement
yangzi evening news: drug xin sentenced to death, who are charged with two life li changkui why death,
the family came to kill you, when retribution?! many countries have now abolished the death penalty. therefore, when the judges to deprive a person's life is bound to be cautious, to consider all sorts of things.
these two cases represent the two types of intentional homicide cases, one is seriously endangered public security, intentional homicide, and another is due to civil conflicts, marriage and family or neighborhood disputes caused by intentional homicide. the first one is not a specific object has a tremendous effect on people's sense of security, a great social harm; the second is for a specific object, social harm is relatively small.
li changkui rape and murder of young girls killed the boy was the case of a trial the death penalty, the second instance because of
> reports:
surrendered is not necessarily lighter, should be a variety of factors to consider
■ cases
the high court to respond
to them, and judgment is not a two judges do it, but after a judicial committee. in accordance with relevant laws and regulations, may be sentenced to death penalty cases must be by a judicial committee to discuss and decide. high court judicial committee of 27 members, each a member of more than half to discussion, but also to the members of more than half (14 or more) agree with the verdict by the court leadership, business backbone in order to make judgments, li changkui case is no exception . therefore, the procedure in the case is perfectly legitimate, factual evidence is also clear that only in the applicable law,mercurial vapor superfly, we have different views. p>
the li changkui case of harm to society in the end be? zhao jiansheng first talked about a case. in a district, a thief through the capitol to found a family is always the night he was over the wall,sac longchamp pas cher, did not expect to encounter a business trip to the master, the master cried out, resist the thief took out the knife to kill his prepared , grab something to escape. a time, residential tenants every family tension, fear, and have installed security doors, security windows. also in this district, a couple conflict,chaussure de foot, husband, wife, mother-in-law killed. this has become residential tenants talk of gossip, who accused this man is cruel, not filial.
sharenchangming requirements triggered by civil conflicts,louboutin pas cher, marriage and family conflicts, neighborhood disputes, cases, application of the death penalty to be very careful. this is the carrying out of the criminal policy of in the traditional sense of the
grudge killing a friend, the death penalty commuted to death with reprieve
video: man killed two people from death, the deceased's family appealed the sentence of capital punishment: heilongjiang tv station to ride morning also on the humane care, showing kindness do?
gao, vice president zhao jiansheng said the objections raised by users on the judgment concept is sharenchangming sense of tradition and modern judicial concept, national criminal policy differences, these are open to explore.
the high court ruled that the legal procedures, there is no favoritism
while li changkui case, the defendant and the victim two in the same village, li changkui back to wang jiafei mentioned pro, because the two occur dispute li changkui back from the field and implementation of a crime. therefore, the case falls within the second type.
the same death, harm to society, we should be treated differently. the supreme court requirements, caused due to civil conflicts, marriage and family conflicts, neighborhood disputes, cases,chaussures de foot, application of the death penalty to be very careful. this is the carrying out of the criminal policy of in the traditional sense of the - zhao jiansheng
many internet users believe that the case decision abstract and simple enough to convince the public zhaotong court of first instance: lee although voluntarily surrendered themselves, according to the law enough to be given a lighter punishment, so the death penalty; yunnan high court upheld the view that: lee sin, but surrendered to actively compensate for the plot, the so reprieve. human life, can these two sets of civil law countries,sac longchamp, a judgment of some of the judges of the common law,air jordan pas cher, with a book. his conscience to the public to see that they, in turn, elected judges are generally prestigious system of protection of the judges is perfect, so the judge can in the judgment on the free play, while our justice have not yet developed to that step. zhao jiansheng said anything pros and cons, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of the program and select only weigh the pros and cons. jurist beccaria once said: will be punished,air jordan, then he is considered to be punished for crime is inevitable, and crime will think twice before you act penalized penalty deterrence is reflected in
the li changkui case is heard by the high court criminal court yesterday, said zhao, the president of the tribunal, a case of contracting in 2007, with the case is somewhat similar to the over 20-year-old man peng a yard administrator in a hotel in kunming, and a security guard at the hotel are good friends, but the security on various occasions, to make fun of him, and he harbored a grudge against the fierce stab knife kill security.
toting two human lives, li changkui second instance commuted the reprieve case lead to a large network to discuss after the high court has re-verification of the case. yesterday, handing out the media briefing, discuss li changkui case. drug xin sentenced to death why li changkui reprieve? surrendered to whether the do not kill indulgence crime ... the meeting, vice president of high zhao jiansheng, vice president of the fields into, the criminal court president zhao 11 responded and questioned on the network.
- tin into
tian as stressed, kill or not kill, the court will take seriously the recommendations of the public opinion,mercurial vapor, but not to decide cases to the national criminal our society needs a more rational by the policies and laws to sentence a person to death, not a public carnival
when the anger of public opinion and the rigor of the law collision, the judge how to manage the legal merits of this fork in the road crowd, but the community is how a rational view of the final results to understand the legal intention is also to be some homework.
tian into said, li changkui and the victim is a neighbor before feelings disputes, two civil disputes, crime for a reason. the law is not harsh to the 1 +1 = 2 kind of situation, otherwise it becomes the concept of law. attitude is made in accordance with the law.
it is reported that the high court review of the case will be the recently announced
ju |
|
发表于 2012-7-30 10:47:17
QQ好友和群
QQ空间
腾讯微博
腾讯朋友
收藏
分享